↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms for reducing low back pain: a mediation analysis of a multifaceted intervention in workers in elderly care

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Mechanisms for reducing low back pain: a mediation analysis of a multifaceted intervention in workers in elderly care
Published in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00420-018-1350-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew L. Stevens, Eleanor Boyle, Jan Hartvigsen, Gemma Mansell, Karen Søgaard, Marie B. Jørgensen, Andreas Holtermann, Charlotte D. N. Rasmussen

Abstract

A multifaceted workplace intervention consisting of participatory ergonomics, physical training, and cognitive-behavioural training (CBT) has shown effectiveness for reducing low back pain (LBP). However, the mechanisms of action underlying these intervention components are not well understood. This was a mediation analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a multifaceted intervention in 420 workers in elderly care. Mediation analysis was carried out via structural equation modelling. Potential mediators investigated were: fear-avoidance beliefs, perceived muscle strength, use of assistive devices at work and perceived physical exertion at work. LBP outcomes assessed were: days with LBP, LBP intensity and days with bothersome LBP. There were no significant indirect effects of the intervention on LBP outcomes. There were significant effects of the intervention on both fear-avoidance measures [β = - 0.63, 95% CI (1.23, 0.03); β = - 1.03, 95% CI (- 1.70, - 0.34)] and the use of assistive devices [β = - 0.55, 95% CI (- 1.04, - 0.05)], but not on perceived muscle strength [β = - 0.18, 95% CI (- 0.50, 0.13)] or physical exertion [β = - 0.05, 95% CI (- 0.40, 0.31)]. The only potential mediator with a significant effect on LBP outcomes was physical exertion, which had a significant effect on LBP intensity [β = 0.14, 95% CI (0.04, 0.23)]. A multifaceted intervention consisting of participatory ergonomics, physical training, and CBT was able to decrease fear-avoidance beliefs and increase use of assistive devices in the workplace. However, these changes did not explain the effect of any of the intervention components on days with LBP, LBP intensity and days with bothersome LBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 227 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 18 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 87 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 49 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 11%
Sports and Recreations 21 9%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 96 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,431,138
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#717
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,012
of 337,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.