| Title |
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-6738-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Rouanet, Martin Marie Bertrand, Marta Jarlier, Anne Mourregot, Drissa Traore, Christophe Taoum, Hélène de Forges, Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 20% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Turkey | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 37% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 33% |
| Scientists | 11 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,146,579
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#131
of 6,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,629
of 339,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.