↓ Skip to main content

Central venous catheter use

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Central venous catheter use
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2001
DOI 10.1007/s00134-001-1154-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kees H. Polderman, Armand R. Girbes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Panama 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 19 14%
Other 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 36 26%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Engineering 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,464
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,928
of 5,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,349
of 125,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.