↓ Skip to main content

The Severe End of the Spectrum: Insights and Opportunities from the Autism Inpatient Collection (AIC)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
The Severe End of the Spectrum: Insights and Opportunities from the Autism Inpatient Collection (AIC)
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10803-018-3731-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Siegel

Abstract

Research on individuals severely affected by autism, including those who are minimally verbal, have intellectual disability or challenging behaviors, has become less common. The Autism Inpatient Collection (AIC) was initiated so data on this group is available to the research community. Ten studies utilizing phenotypic data from the first 350 AIC participants are presented. Greater autism severity, sleep disturbance, and psychiatric disorders are risks for hospitalization; fluently verbal youth experience more depression and oppositional symptoms; lower adaptive/coping skills are associated with increased problem behaviors; lower IQ is a risk for SIB; post-traumatic and suicidal symptoms are common; and challenging behaviors improve with specialized inpatient treatment. A new measure of emotion regulation and prescribing practices are described and future research discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 35 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,817,163
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#738
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,852
of 346,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.