↓ Skip to main content

Nudity as a Disinhibiting Cue in a Date Rape Analogue

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Nudity as a Disinhibiting Cue in a Date Rape Analogue
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0633-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annabree Fairweather, Drew A. Kingston, Martin L. Lalumière

Abstract

Situational factors likely play a role in date rape. The sexual inhibition hypothesis suggests that men are typically sexually inhibited by violence and non-consent, but that inhibition can also be disrupted. We attempted to determine if female nudity reduces inhibition of sexual arousal to non-consensual cues in sexually non-aggressive men. In two studies, heterosexual men (aged 18-25) were presented with six 2-min audiotaped narratives depicting consensual sexual interactions, non-consensual sexual interactions (rape), and non-sexual interactions (neutral) involving a man and a woman. In the first study, 20 participants saw pictures depicting nude or clothed women while listening to the stories. In the second study, 20 other participants saw videos depicting nude or clothed women exercising, also while listening to the stories. Genital responses and subjective sexual arousal were measured. Results suggested that nudity may have a disinhibitory effect on sexual arousal to non-consensual cues, but only when presented in the form of moving images.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 39%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,858,358
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#913
of 3,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,878
of 292,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.