↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting Immune Exhaustion During HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 473)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Revisiting Immune Exhaustion During HIV Infection
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11904-010-0066-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alka Khaitan, Derya Unutmaz

Abstract

Chronic immune activation is a hallmark of HIV infection, yet the underlying triggers of immune activation remain unclear. Persistent antigenic stimulation during HIV infection may also lead to immune exhaustion, a phenomenon in which effector T cells become dysfunctional and lose effector functions and proliferative capacity. Several markers of immune exhaustion, such as PD-1, LAG-3, Tim-3, and CTLA-4, which are also negative regulators of immune activation, are preferentially upregulated on T cells during HIV infection. It is not yet clear whether accumulation of T cells expressing activation inhibitory molecules is a consequence of general immune or chronic HIV-specific immune activation. Importantly, however, in vitro blockade of PD-1 and Tim-3 restores HIV-specific T-cell responses, indicating potential for immunotherapies. In this review we discuss the evolution of our understanding of immune exhaustion during HIV infection, highlighting novel markers and potential therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 233 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 21%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 45 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 35 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2022.
All research outputs
#795,193
of 25,388,837 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#8
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,347
of 187,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,837 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them