↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Helicobacter spp. associated GFD markers for detecting avian fecal pollution in natural waters of two continents

Overview of attention for article published in Water Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of Helicobacter spp. associated GFD markers for detecting avian fecal pollution in natural waters of two continents
Published in
Water Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.10.050
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Ahmed, V.J. Harwood, K. Nguyen, S. Young, K. Hamilton, S. Toze

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Engineering 6 9%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2015.
All research outputs
#21,285,712
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Water Research
#8,476
of 12,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,421
of 301,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Research
#70
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.