| Title |
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) based method for rapid and sensitive detection of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus and the psyllid vector, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13562-015-0332-8 |
| Authors |
Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Sumit Bhose, Ashish Warghane, Manali Motghare, Ashwani Kumar Sharma, Arun Kumar Dhar, Siddarame Gowda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#92
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,972
of 275,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.