↓ Skip to main content

Structural Home Environment Effects on Developmental Trajectories of Self-Control and Adolescent Risk Taking

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Structural Home Environment Effects on Developmental Trajectories of Self-Control and Adolescent Risk Taking
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0921-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Holmes, Alexis Brieant, Rachel Kahn, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Jungmeen Kim-Spoon

Abstract

Extant literature has demonstrated that self-control is critical for health and adjustment in adolescence. Questions remain regarding whether there are individuals that may be most vulnerable to impaired self-control development and whether aspects of the structural home environment may predict membership in these subgroups, as well as the behavioral consequences of impaired self-control trajectories. The present study utilized growth mixture modeling and data from 1083 individuals (50% female, 82% White) from age 8.5 to 15 years to identify four latent classes of self-control development. Additionally, higher household chaos and lower socioeconomic status at age 8.5 were associated with maladaptive trajectories of self-control at ages 8.5-11.5. In turn, maladaptive self-control trajectories at ages 8.5-11.5 were associated with higher risk taking at age 15. The results highlight the importance of increased structure and support for at-risk youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Professor 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 52 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 26%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 54 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,032,495
of 24,333,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#368
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,195
of 339,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,333,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.