↓ Skip to main content

Repurposing climate reconstructions for drought prediction in Southeast Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Repurposing climate reconstructions for drought prediction in Southeast Asia
Published in
Climatic Change, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0064-2
Authors

Andrew R. Bell, Benjamin I. Cook, Kevin J. Anchukaitis, Brendan M. Buckley, Edward R. Cook

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 36%
Environmental Science 10 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,846,113
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,321
of 5,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,466
of 108,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#31
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.