Title |
Repurposing climate reconstructions for drought prediction in Southeast Asia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Climatic Change, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10584-011-0064-2 |
Authors |
Andrew R. Bell, Benjamin I. Cook, Kevin J. Anchukaitis, Brendan M. Buckley, Edward R. Cook |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
Researcher | 9 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,846,113
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,321
of 5,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,466
of 108,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#31
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.