↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between Excision Margins and Local Recurrence in 11,290 Thin (T1) Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: A Case–Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The Association Between Excision Margins and Local Recurrence in 11,290 Thin (T1) Primary Cutaneous Melanomas: A Case–Control Study
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4942-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alastair D. MacKenzie Ross, Lauren E. Haydu, Michael J. Quinn, Robyn P. M. Saw, Kerwin F. Shannon, Andrew J. Spillane, Jonathan R. Stretch, Richard A. Scolyer, John F. Thompson

Abstract

At presentation, most primary cutaneous melanomas are "thin" (Breslow thickness ≤1 mm, designated T1 in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) and local recurrence (LR) is rare. Most current management guidelines recommend 1 cm surgical excision margins for T1 melanomas, but evidence to support this recommendation is sparse. We sought to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with LR in patients with T1 melanomas that might guide primary tumor management. From a large, prospectively collected, single-institution database, patients with primary cutaneous melanomas ≤1 mm thick diagnosed between 1970 and 2011 who developed LR were identified and matched with controls. Clinical and pathologic parameters were analyzed for their association with LR. From 11,290 primary melanomas ≤1 mm thick, 176 (1.56 %) cases with LR were identified and 176 controls (without LR) were selected. LR occurred after a median time of 37 months (range 3-306 months) and was associated with narrower excision margins (hazard ratio = 0.95, 95 % confidence interval 0.92-0.98, p = 0.001), desmoplastic, acral, and lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes (p = 0.008), and melanomas composed predominantly of spindle cells (p = 0.005). However, Breslow thickness, Clark level, ulceration, mitotic rate, regression, and lymphovascular invasion were not. LR was associated with <8 mm histologic excision margins (corresponding to <1 cm margins in vivo) and desmoplastic, acral, and lentigo maligna melanoma subtypes. This study provides evidence that a ≥1 cm clinical excision margin for thin (T1) primary melanomas reduces the risk of LR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Professor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,430,119
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,981
of 6,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,947
of 282,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#78
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.