↓ Skip to main content

Certainty within uncertainty: a qualitative study of the experience of metastatic melanoma patients undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Certainty within uncertainty: a qualitative study of the experience of metastatic melanoma patients undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00520-018-4443-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Levy, Haryana M. Dhillon, Anna Lomax, Michael Marthick, Catriona McNeil, Steven Kao, Judith Lacey

Abstract

Little is known about the lived experiences of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We conducted a feasibility study of a supportive care intervention for melanoma patients being treated with pembrolizumab. Here, we report a secondary objective of the study, which was to explore the lived experience of being on pembrolizumab treatment for advanced melanoma. Twenty-eight participants with metastatic melanoma were recruited across two cohorts, all receiving 3-weekly immunotherapy treatment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 participants once at 9 weeks. Thematic analysis using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was performed with multiple iterations of data review to achieve consensus. Three overarching themes were identified; here, we report the first and most dominant theme: how metastatic melanoma patients live within uncertain spaces. Although immunotherapy increases overall survival, metastatic melanoma patients live within an uncertain spectrum. They confront uncertainty related to immunotherapy treatment, their disease trajectory, family relationships, and decision-making. Melanoma patients attempt to normalize their lives, engaging in their usual activities. Uncertainty increases prior to active treatment and intensifies during investigation phases. Despite progress in melanoma patient treatment and outcomes, these patients face sustained uncertainty about their disease trajectory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Psychology 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 18 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,827,052
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#522
of 5,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,517
of 345,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#23
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.