Title |
When ‘yes’ means ‘no’: why the small details of clinical interactions matter
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp18x698441 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deborah Swinglehurst, Sarah Atkins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 44% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 11 | 44% |
Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
Linguistics | 1 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,063,291
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,004
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,731
of 334,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#30
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.