| Title |
Effects of low and elevated CO2 on C3 and C4 annuals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00328895 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. T. Tissue, K. L. Griffin, R. B. Thomas, B. R. Strain |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#5,976,624
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,256
of 4,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,165
of 76,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.