↓ Skip to main content

CDKN1A histone acetylation and gene expression relationship in gastric adenocarcinomas

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
CDKN1A histone acetylation and gene expression relationship in gastric adenocarcinomas
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10238-015-0400-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Wisnieski, Danielle Queiroz Calcagno, Mariana Ferreira Leal, Leonardo Caires Santos, Carolina Oliveira Gigek, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Sâmia Demachki, Ricardo Artigiani, Paulo Pimentel Assumpção, Laércio Gomes Lourenço, Rommel Rodríguez Burbano, Marília Cardoso Smith

Abstract

CDKN1A is a tumor suppressor gene involved in gastric carcinogenesis and is a potential target for histone deacetylase inhibitor-based therapies. Upregulation of CDKN1A is generally observed in several cell lines after histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment; however, little is known about the histone acetylation status associated with this gene in clinical samples, including gastric tumor tissue samples. Therefore, our goal was to quantify the H3K9 and H4K16 acetylation levels associated with three CDKN1A regions in 21 matched pairs of gastric adenocarcinoma and corresponding adjacent non-tumor samples by chromatin immunoprecipitation and to correlate these data with the gene expression. Our results demonstrated that the -402, -20, and +182 CDKN1A regions showed a significantly increased acetylation level in at least one of the histones evaluated (p < 0.05, for all comparisons), and these levels were positively correlated in gastric tumors. However, an inverse correlation was detected between both H3K9 and H4K16 acetylation at the -402 CDKN1A region and mRNA levels in gastric tumors (r = -0.51, p = 0.02; r = -0.60, p < 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, increased H4K16 acetylation at the -20 CDKN1A region was associated with gastric tumors of patients without lymph node metastasis (p = 0.04). These results highlight the complexity of these processes in gastric adenocarcinoma and contribute to a better understanding of CDKN1A regulation in carcinogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Unspecified 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 36%
Unspecified 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2015.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#366
of 510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,272
of 284,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.