| Title |
Non-LTR retrotransposons in fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Functional & Integrative Genomics, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10142-008-0093-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga Novikova, Victor Fet, Alexander Blinov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 73% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,468,944
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#64
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,097
of 82,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional & Integrative Genomics
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.