↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacoeconomics and Clinical Practice Guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacoeconomics and Clinical Practice Guidelines
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200017020-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Anell, Patrick Svarvar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Master 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,798,945
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#382
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,034
of 189,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#66
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.