Title |
Opening clinical trial data: are the voluntary data-sharing portals enough?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0525-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nophar Geifman, Jennifer Bollyky, Sanchita Bhattacharya, Atul J. Butte |
Abstract |
Data generated by the numerous clinical trials conducted annually worldwide have the potential to be extremely beneficial to the scientific and patient communities. This potential is well recognized and efforts are being made to encourage the release of raw patient-level data from these trials to the public. The issue of sharing clinical trial data has recently gained attention, with many agreeing that this type of data should be made available for research in a timely manner. The availability of clinical trial data is most important for study reproducibility, meta-analyses, and improvement of study design. There is much discussion in the community over key data sharing issues, including the risks this practice holds. However, one aspect that remains to be adequately addressed is that of the accessibility, quality, and usability of the data being shared. Herein, experiences with the two current major platforms used to store and disseminate clinical trial data are described, discussing the issues encountered and suggesting possible solutions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 30 | 37% |
United Kingdom | 12 | 15% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Comoros | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 57% |
Scientists | 26 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
Engineering | 5 | 12% |
Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 2 | 5% |