↓ Skip to main content

Bumblebee learning and memory is impaired by chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
62 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bumblebee learning and memory is impaired by chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep16508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dara A. Stanley, Karen E. Smith, Nigel E. Raine

Abstract

Bumblebees are exposed to pesticides applied for crop protection while foraging on treated plants, with increasing evidence suggesting that this sublethal exposure has implications for pollinator declines. The challenges of navigating and learning to manipulate many different flowers underline the critical role learning plays for the foraging success and survival of bees. We assessed the impacts of both acute and chronic exposure to field-realistic levels of a widely applied neonicotinoid insecticide, thiamethoxam, on bumblebee odour learning and memory. Although bees exposed to acute doses showed conditioned responses less frequently than controls, we found no difference in the number of individuals able to learn at field-realistic exposure levels. However, following chronic pesticide exposure, bees exposed to field-realistic levels learnt more slowly and their short-term memory was significantly impaired following exposure to 2.4 ppb pesticide. These results indicate that field-realistic pesticide exposure can have appreciable impacts on learning and memory, with potential implications for essential individual behaviour and colony fitness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 266 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 21%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 48%
Environmental Science 35 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 65 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 232. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#166,394
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,015
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,033
of 276,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#31
of 2,571 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,571 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.