| Title |
A Survey of Techniques for Predicting Earthquake Ground Motions for Engineering Purposes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surveys in Geophysics, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y |
| Authors |
John Douglas, Hideo Aochi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 67 | 42% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#145
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,105
of 107,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.