↓ Skip to main content

Against fields

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Against fields
Published in
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13194-017-0179-z
Authors

Dustin Lazarovici

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Other 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 45%
Philosophy 3 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,518,487
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#97
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,386
of 316,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.