↓ Skip to main content

Verteilung der Sichtungskategorien bei Terroranschlägen mit einem Massenanfall von Verletzten

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Verteilung der Sichtungskategorien bei Terroranschlägen mit einem Massenanfall von Verletzten
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00113-018-0543-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Juncken, A. R. Heller, D. Cwojdzinski, A. C. Disch, C. Kleber

Abstract

The incidence and character of civil mass casualty incidents (MCI) has changed in the last decades, in particular because of the rising number of terrorist attacks. As a result, the question arises whether commonly used tools of prevention and prehospital planning, including the distribution of triage categories (T1 severely injured/T2 seriously injured/T3 slightly injured) with 15%/20%/60% have to be modified. The rescue workers make the classification of the triage categories in MCIs at the scene. The aim of this article is to verify the planning size of variable distribution of the triage categories. A total of 244 MCI with >9 casualties from 1 January 1985 to 31 May 2017 in Europe and Turkey were identified by a systematic literature search and analyzed with respect to the distribution of T in the first 24 h. An incidence of 10% T1, 17% T2, 49% T3 and 5% deaths was detected (median). Due to the previously use of the average of the triage categories in the contingency plan, the calculation showed a slightly different distribution from 15%/30%/55%. Of the events 7 were natural disasters, 227 terrorist attacks, 9 accidents and 1 mass panic. Natural disasters showed a higher than average death rate (11%), especially landslide incidents (67%). Civilian accidents showed a distribution of T of 10%/17%/55%, with train derailments having twice as many T1 patients and plane crashes just under twice as many T2 patients. In the case of terrorist attacks, the expected planning parameters were not quite achieved with 14%/15%/39%. Especially "combined hits" and amok driving had high incidences of T1 patients (18% and 21%, respectively). In addition, the T2 patients with 42% in amok driving and 48% in mass panics were well above the planning size of 20% and 30%, respectively. Calculation of the severity factor according to deBoer for amok driving and the result that at S ≥ 1.5 many seriously injured persons can be suspected, amok driving showed the highest degree of severity (S = 1.8) in our study. This indicates the severity of a disaster depending on the number of casualties per triage category.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#225
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,714
of 345,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.