↓ Skip to main content

Creatinine and urea biosensors based on a novel ammonium ion-selective copper-polyaniline nano-composite

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creatinine and urea biosensors based on a novel ammonium ion-selective copper-polyaniline nano-composite
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Zhybak, V. Beni, M.Y. Vagin, E. Dempsey, A.P.F. Turner, Y. Korpan

Abstract

The use of a novel ammonium ion-specific copper-polyaniline nano-composite as transducer for hydrolase-based biosensors is proposed. In this work, a combination of creatinine deaminase and urease has been chosen as a model system to demonstrate the construction of urea and creatinine biosensors to illustrate the principle. Immobilisation of enzymes was shown to be a crucial step in the development of the biosensors; the use of glycerol and lactitol as stabilisers resulted in a significant improvement, especially in the case of the creatinine, of the operational stability of the biosensors (from few hours to at least 3 days). The developed biosensors exhibited high selectivity towards creatinine and urea. The sensitivity was found to be 85±3.4mAM(-1)cm(-2) for the creatinine biosensor and 112±3.36mAM(-1)cm(-2) for the urea biosensor, with apparent Michaelis-Menten constants (KM,app), obtained from the creatinine and urea calibration curves, of 0.163mM for creatinine deaminase and 0.139mM for urease, respectively. The biosensors responded linearly over the concentration range 1-125µM, with a limit of detection of 0.5µM and a response time of 15s. The performance of the biosensors in a real sample matrix, serum, was evaluated and a good correlation with standard spectrophotometric clinical laboratory techniques was found.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 34 24%
Engineering 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Materials Science 5 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 54 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,197,484
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#4,130
of 6,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,893
of 291,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#47
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.