| Title |
Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knowledge In Society, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6 |
| Authors |
John Zerilli, Alistair Knott, James Maclaurin, Colin Gavaghan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 15% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Belgium | 3 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 4% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 69% |
| Scientists | 15 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 318 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 107 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 42 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 34 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 29 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 17% |
| Unknown | 110 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#629,299
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Knowledge In Society
#30
of 556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,275
of 346,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knowledge In Society
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.