↓ Skip to main content

A Culturally Sensitive Approach to the Relationships between Identity Formation and Religious Beliefs in Youth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
A Culturally Sensitive Approach to the Relationships between Identity Formation and Religious Beliefs in Youth
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10964-018-0920-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazumi Sugimura, Kobo Matsushima, Shogo Hihara, Masami Takahashi, Elisabetta Crocetti

Abstract

Youth encounter issues of religion in the process of identity formation. However, most prior studies have focused on Christian youth in Western counties. This study examined the relationship between identity formation and religious beliefs in the Eastern national context where Buddhism and non-institutional folk religions are prevalent. Participants were 969 Japanese youth (51.3% female; Mage = 20.1). Both literal and symbolic religious beliefs were included and both a variable- and person-oriented approach were used based on the three-factor identity model. The results from the variable-oriented approach (i.e., identity processes) demonstrated that identity commitment was positively associated with literal religious beliefs, whereas reconsideration of commitment was positively associated with both literal and symbolic religious beliefs. Findings from the person-oriented approach (i.e., identity statuses) confirmed these results. Overall, this study highlights the importance of religious beliefs in the process of identity formation among youth in an Eastern national context.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 37%
Social Sciences 8 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,128,890
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#628
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,492
of 338,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#19
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.