↓ Skip to main content

Drugs in Semen

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Drugs in Semen
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00003088-199426050-00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Pichini, Piergiorgio Zuccaro, Roberta Pacifici

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, a decline in the quality of semen has been observed, possibly resulting in a reduction in male fertility. Among the factors affecting semen quality, exposure to drugs is of particular importance. It is known that drugs can be transported to the seminal plasma, which is made up of secretions from the various accessory genital glands. There is evidence that many drugs enter the male genitourinary tract by an ion-trapping process. Lipid solubility and the degree of ionisation of the drug, which depend on the pH of plasma and seminal fluid, are important factors in this process. To date, few studies have been conducted on this topic. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the fluids of the male accessory gland have been performed in the case of chloroquine and caffeine only, while the effects of mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid), sulfasalazine, salicylate, propranolol, diltiazem, flunarizine, verapamil, caffeine and nicotine on sperm physiology and morphology have been examined. Although data from the literature are scarce and incomplete, it is evident that many drugs can be excreted into semen. These drugs may interfere with the most common semen characteristics, potentially resulting in a male-mediated teratogenic effect, or local and systemic responses in female recipients. Therefore, it may be advisable to include, in the processes of drug development, pharmacokinetic evaluation of a drug in the semen and analysis of standard microscopic parameters of the semen. This is particularly important for drugs known to concentrate in the semen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 32%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Chemistry 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,579,596
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#188
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,187
of 201,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#72
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.