↓ Skip to main content

Maribacter spongiicola sp. nov. and Maribacter vaceletii sp. nov., isolated from marine sponges, and emended description of the genus Maribacter

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maribacter spongiicola sp. nov. and Maribacter vaceletii sp. nov., isolated from marine sponges, and emended description of the genus Maribacter
Published in
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, April 2015
DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.000224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen A Jackson, Jonathan Kennedy, John P Morrissey, Fergal O'Gara, Alan D W Dobson

Abstract

Two Gram-staining-negative, rod-shaped, orange-coloured, catalase positive, oxidase positive, non-motile bacteria designated W13M1AT and W15M10T were isolated from the marine sponges Suberites carnosus and Leucosolenia sp. respectively, sampled from Lough Hyne, Co. Cork, Ireland. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences of these isolates revealed that they are members of the genus Maribacter, in the Flavobacteriaceae family of the phylum Bacteroidetes. The type strain most closely related to strain W13M1AT is M. forsetii DSM 18668T with gene sequence similarity of 96.5%. The closest related type strain to strain W15M10T is M. orientalis DSM 16471T with gene sequence similarity of 98.3%. Phylogenetic inference and phenotypic data combined indicate that strains W13M1AT and W15M10T represent novel species in the genus Maribacter and the names Maribacter vaceletii and Maribacter spongiicola are proposed with W13M1AT (= NCIMB 14724T = DSM 25230T) and W15M10T (= NCIMB 14725T = DSM 25233T), respectively as the type strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 4 20%
Other 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#9,496
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,204
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#115
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.