↓ Skip to main content

Development of a dynamic computational model of social cognitive theory

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Behavioral Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Development of a dynamic computational model of social cognitive theory
Published in
Translational Behavioral Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13142-015-0356-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

William T. Riley, Cesar A. Martin, Daniel E. Rivera, Eric B. Hekler, Marc A. Adams, Matthew P. Buman, Misha Pavel, Abby C. King

Abstract

Social cognitive theory (SCT) is among the most influential theories of behavior change and has been used as the conceptual basis of health behavior interventions for smoking cessation, weight management, and other health behaviors. SCT and other behavior theories were developed primarily to explain differences between individuals, but explanatory theories of within-person behavioral variability are increasingly needed as new technologies allow for intensive longitudinal measures and interventions adapted from these inputs. These within-person explanatory theoretical applications can be modeled as dynamical systems. SCT constructs, such as reciprocal determinism, are inherently dynamical in nature, but SCT has not been modeled as a dynamical system. This paper describes the development of a dynamical system model of SCT using fluid analogies and control systems principles drawn from engineering. Simulations of this model were performed to assess if the model performed as predicted based on theory and empirical studies of SCT. This initial model generates precise and testable quantitative predictions for future intensive longitudinal research. Dynamic modeling approaches provide a rigorous method for advancing health behavior theory development and refinement and for guiding the development of more potent and efficient interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Computer Science 10 6%
Other 47 28%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,265,957
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#266
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,680
of 298,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.