| Title |
Co-opting Colleagues: Appropriating Dobzhansky's 1936 Lectures at Columbia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, June 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1016008821530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joe Cain |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 1 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#190
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,701
of 126,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.