| Title |
Building on Bedrock: William Steel Creighton and the Reformation of Ant Systematics, 1925–1970
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, January 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1004712911037 |
| Authors |
Joshua Buhs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 60% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#191
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,912
of 109,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.