↓ Skip to main content

Why (and When) Straight Women Trust Gay Men: Ulterior Mating Motives and Female Competition

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Why (and When) Straight Women Trust Gay Men: Ulterior Mating Motives and Female Competition
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0648-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric M. Russell, Vivian P. Ta, David M. G. Lewis, Meghan J. Babcock, William Ickes

Abstract

Previous findings indicate that heterosexual women experience a greater sense of comfort and trust in their friendships with gay men than in their friendships with heterosexual individuals. In the present studies, we tested a hypothesis that not only explains why women exhibit increased trust in gay men but also yields novel predictions about when (i.e., in what contexts) this phenomenon is likely to occur. Specifically, we propose that gay men's lack of motives to mate with women or to compete with them for mates enhances women's trust in gay men and openness to befriend them. Study 1 demonstrated that women placed greater trust in a gay man's mating-but not non-mating (e.g., career) advice-than in the same advice given by heterosexual individuals. Study 2 showed that women perceived a gay man to be more sincere in scenarios relevant to sexual and competitive mating deception. In Study 3, exposing women to a visualization of increased mating competition enhanced their trust in gay men; when mating competition was salient, women's trust in mating information from a gay man was amplified. Study 4 showed that women who perceived higher levels of mating competition were more open to befriending gay men. Together, these converging findings support our central hypothesis, which not only provides a distal explanation for the trust that straight women place in gay men, but also provides novel insights into previously unidentified contexts that facilitate the formation and strengthening of this unique bond.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 54%
Social Sciences 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 329. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#100,643
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#61
of 3,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,409
of 399,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.