↓ Skip to main content

Population Composition, Public Policy, and the Genetics of Smoking

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Population Composition, Public Policy, and the Genetics of Smoking
Published in
Demography, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13524-011-0057-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason D. Boardman, Casey L. Blalock, Fred C. Pampel, Peter K. Hatemi, Andrew C. Heath, Lindon J. Eaves

Abstract

In this article, we explore the effect of public policy on the extent to which genes influence smoking desistance. Using a sample of adult twins (n(mz) = 363, n(dz) = 233) from a large population registry, we estimate Cox proportional hazards models that describe similarity in the timing of smoking desistance among adult twin pairs. We show that identical twin pairs are significantly more likely to quit smoking within a similar time frame compared with fraternal twin pairs. Importantly, we then show that genetic factors for smoking desistance increase in importance following restrictive legislation on smoking behaviors that occurred in the early and mid-1970s. These findings support the social push perspective and make important contributions to the social demography and genetic epidemiology of smoking as well as to the gene-environment interaction literatures.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Other 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 36%
Psychology 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%