↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Karate Techniques Training on Communication Deficit of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
Title
The Effect of Karate Techniques Training on Communication Deficit of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2643-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatimah Bahrami, Ahmadreza Movahedi, Sayed Mohammad Marandi, Carl Sorensen

Abstract

This investigation examined the long term effect of Karate techniques training on communication of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Thirty school aged children with ASD were randomly assigned to an exercise (n = 15) or a control group (n = 15). Participants in the exercise group were engaged in 14 weeks of Karate techniques training. Communication deficit at baseline, post-intervention (week 14), and at 1 month follow up were evaluated. Exercise group showed significant reduction in communication deficit compared to control group. Moreover, reduction in communication deficit in the exercise group at one month follow up remained unchanged compared to post-intervention time. We concluded that teaching Karate techniques to children with ASD leads to significant reduction in their communication deficit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 300 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 16%
Student > Master 47 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Researcher 17 6%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 94 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 15%
Sports and Recreations 44 15%
Psychology 30 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 9%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 108 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,038,627
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#349
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,011
of 394,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#5
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.