| Title |
Medical School Experiences Associated with Change in Implicit Racial Bias Among 3547 Students: A Medical Student CHANGES Study Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-015-3447-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle van Ryn, Rachel Hardeman, Sean M. Phelan, Diana J. Burgess PhD, John F. Dovidio, Jeph Herrin, Sara E. Burke, David B. Nelson, Sylvia Perry, Mark Yeazel, Julia M. Przedworski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 438 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 65 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 10% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 9% |
| Other | 101 | 23% |
| Unknown | 99 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 28% |
| Psychology | 53 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 10% |
| Unknown | 119 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#443,086
of 25,278,281 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#349
of 8,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,669
of 269,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#8
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,278,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.