| Title |
Quantitative Risk Assessment of the Pathways by Which West Nile Virus Could Reach Hawaii
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-004-0086-6 |
| Authors |
A. Marm Kilpatrick, Yekaterina Gluzberg, Jeff Burgett, Peter Daszak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 47% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 6 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,369,297
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#235
of 758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,287
of 63,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.