↓ Skip to main content

Optically-controlled platforms for transfection and single- and sub-cellular surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Optically-controlled platforms for transfection and single- and sub-cellular surgery
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12551-015-0179-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Villangca, Duncan Casey, Jesper Glückstad

Abstract

Improving the resolution of biological research to the single-cell or sub-cellular level is of critical importance in a wide variety of processes and disease conditions. Most obvious are those linked to aging and cancer, many of which are dependent upon stochastic processes where individual, unpredictable failures or mutations in individual cells can lead to serious downstream conditions across the whole organism. The traditional tools of biochemistry struggle to observe such processes: the vast majority are based upon ensemble approaches analysing the properties of bulk populations, which means that details of individual constituents is lost. What are required, then, are tools with the precision and resolution to probe and dissect cells at the single-micron scale: the scale of the individual organelles and structures that control their function. In this review, we highlight the use of highly-focused laser beams to create systems which provide precise control and specificity at the single-cell or even single-micron level. The intense focal points generated can directly interact with cells and cell membranes, which in conjunction with related modalities such as optical trapping provide a broad platform for the development of single-cell and sub-cellular surgery approaches. These highly tuneable tools have been demonstrated to deliver or remove material from cells of interest, and they can simultaneously excite fluorescent probes for imaging purposes or plasmonic structures for very local heating. We discuss both the history and recent applications of the field, highlighting the key findings and developments over the last 40 years of biophotonics research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 29%
Physics and Astronomy 5 16%
Chemistry 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,777,370
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#382
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,629
of 252,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.