You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary folate intake and pancreatic cancer risk: Results from the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ijc.31830 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin Young Park, H. Bas Bueno‐de‐Mesquita, Pietro Ferrari, Elisabete Weiderpass, Jordi de Batlle, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyro, Vinciane Rebours, Marie‐Christine Boutron‐Ruault, Francesca Romana Mancini, Verena Katzke, Tilman Kühn, Heiner Boeing, Antonia Trichopoulou, Carlo La Vecchia, Maria Kritikou, Giovanna Masala, Valeria Pala, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Petra H. Peeters, Guri Skeie, Susana Merino, Eric J. Duell, Miguel Rodríguez‐Barranco, Miren Dorronsoro, Maria‐Dolores Chirlaque, Eva Ardanaz, Björn Gylling, Jörn Schneede, Ulrika Ericson, Hanna Sternby, Kay‐Tee Khaw, Kathryn E. Bradbury, Inge Huybrechts, Dagfinn Aune, Paolo Vineis, Nadia Slimani |
| Abstract |
Pancreatic cancer (PC) has an exceptionally low survival rate and primary prevention strategies are limited. Folate plays an important role in one-carbon metabolism and has been associated with the risk of several cancers, but not consistently with PC risk. We aimed to investigate the association between dietary folate intake and PC risk, using the standardised folate database across 10 European countries. A total of 477,206 participants were followed up for 11 years, during which 865 incident primary PC cases were recorded. Folate intake was energy-adjusted using the residual method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. In multivariable analyses stratified by age, sex, study centre and adjusted for energy intake, smoking status, BMI, educational level, diabetes status, supplement use and dietary fibre intake, we found no significant association between folate intake and PC risk: the HR of PC risk for those in the highest quartile of folate intake (≥353 μg/d) compared with the lowest (<241 μg/d) was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.31; Ptrend = 0.38). In current smokers, a positive trend was observed in PC risk across folate quartiles (HR=4.42 (95% CI: 1.05, 18.62) for ≥353 μg/d vs. <241 μg/d, Ptrend = 0.01). Nonetheless, there was no significant interaction between smoking and dietary folate intake (Pinteraction = 0.99). We found no association between dietary folate intake and PC risk in this large European study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,140,033
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#9,287
of 11,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,259
of 435,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#91
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.