↓ Skip to main content

Outcome predictors in guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Behaviour Research & Therapy, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome predictors in guided and unguided self-help for social anxiety disorder
Published in
Behaviour Research & Therapy, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2011.10.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Nordgreen, O.E. Havik, L.G. Öst, T. Furmark, P. Carlbring, G. Andersson

Abstract

Internet-based self-help with therapist guidance has shown promise as an effective treatment and may increase access to evidence-based psychological treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Although unguided self-help has been suggested primarily as a population-based preventive intervention, some studies indicate that patients with SAD may profit from unguided self-help. Gaining knowledge about predictors of outcome in guided and unguided self-help for SAD is important to ensure that these interventions can be offered to those who are most likely to respond. Utilizing a sample of 245 patients who received either guided or unguided self-help for SAD, the present study examined pre-treatment symptoms and program factors as predictors of treatment adherence and outcome. The results were in line with previous findings from the face-to-face treatment literature: namely, the intensity of baseline SAD symptoms, but not depressive symptoms, predicted treatment outcomes in both unguided and guided self-help groups. Outcomes were unrelated to whether a participant has generalized versus specific SAD. Furthermore, for the unguided self-help group, higher credibility ratings of the treatment program were associated with increased treatment adherence. The findings suggest that guided and unguided self-help may increase access to SAD treatment in a population that is more heterogeneous than previously assumed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Norway 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 270 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 16%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 52 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 148 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 64 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#1,506
of 2,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,745
of 141,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behaviour Research & Therapy
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.