↓ Skip to main content

Production of optically pure l(+)-lactic acid from waste plywood chips using an isolated thermotolerant Enterococcus faecalis SI at a pilot scale

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Production of optically pure l(+)-lactic acid from waste plywood chips using an isolated thermotolerant Enterococcus faecalis SI at a pilot scale
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10295-018-2078-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuo-Fu Yuan, Teng-Chieh Hsu, Chun-An Wang, Ming-Feng Jang, Yang-Cheng Kuo, Hal S Alper, Gia-Luen Guo, Wen-Song Hwang

Abstract

Utilization of renewable and low-cost lignocellulosic wastes has received major focus in industrial lactic acid production. The use of high solid loadings in biomass pretreatment potentially offers advantages over low solid loadings including higher lactic acid concentration with decreased production and capital costs. In this study, an isolated Enterococcus faecalis SI with optimal temperature 42 °C was used to produce optically pure L-lactic acid (> 99%) from enzyme-saccharified hydrolysates of acid-impregnated steam explosion (AISE)-treated plywood chips. The L-lactic acid production increased by 10% at 5 L scale compared to the similar fermentation scheme reported by Wee et al. The fermentation with a high solid loading of 20% and 35% (w/v) AISE-pretreated plywood chips had been successfully scaled up to process development unit scale (100 L) and pilot scale (9 m3), respectively. This is the first report of pilot-scale lignocellulosic lactic acid fermentation by E. faecalis with high lactic acid titer (nearly 92 g L-1) and yield (0.97 kg kg-1). Therefore, large-scale L-lactic acid production by E. faecalis SI shows the potential application for industries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Chemical Engineering 6 15%
Engineering 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1,297
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,904
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.