↓ Skip to main content

A resting state fMRI analysis pipeline for pooling inference across diverse cohorts: an ENIGMA rs-fMRI protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
A resting state fMRI analysis pipeline for pooling inference across diverse cohorts: an ENIGMA rs-fMRI protocol
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9941-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhim M. Adhikari, Neda Jahanshad, Dinesh Shukla, Jessica Turner, Dominik Grotegerd, Udo Dannlowski, Harald Kugel, Jennifer Engelen, Bruno Dietsche, Axel Krug, Tilo Kircher, Els Fieremans, Jelle Veraart, Dmitry S. Novikov, Premika S. W. Boedhoe, Ysbrand D. van der Werf, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Jonathan Ipser, Anne Uhlmann, Dan J. Stein, Erin Dickie, Aristotle N. Voineskos, Anil K. Malhotra, Fabrizio Pizzagalli, Vince D. Calhoun, Lea Waller, Ilja M. Veer, Hernik Walter, Robert W. Buchanan, David C. Glahn, L. Elliot Hong, Paul M. Thompson, Peter Kochunov

Abstract

Large-scale consortium efforts such as Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) and other collaborative efforts show that combining statistical data from multiple independent studies can boost statistical power and achieve more accurate estimates of effect sizes, contributing to more reliable and reproducible research. A meta- analysis would pool effects from studies conducted in a similar manner, yet to date, no such harmonized protocol exists for resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) data. Here, we propose an initial pipeline for multi-site rsfMRI analysis to allow research groups around the world to analyze scans in a harmonized way, and to perform coordinated statistical tests. The challenge lies in the fact that resting state fMRI measurements collected by researchers over the last decade vary widely, with variable quality and differing spatial or temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR). An effective harmonization must provide optimal measures for all quality data. Here we used rsfMRI data from twenty-two independent studies with approximately fifty corresponding T1-weighted and rsfMRI datasets each, to (A) review and aggregate the state of existing rsfMRI data, (B) demonstrate utility of principal component analysis (PCA)-based denoising and (C) develop a deformable ENIGMA EPI template based on the representative anatomy that incorporates spatial distortion patterns from various protocols and populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 29 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 13%
Psychology 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Engineering 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 38 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,047,669
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#443
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,178
of 336,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.