↓ Skip to main content

Printing two-dimensional gallium phosphate out of liquid metal

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Printing two-dimensional gallium phosphate out of liquid metal
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06124-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nitu Syed, Ali Zavabeti, Jian Zhen Ou, Md Mohiuddin, Naresh Pillai, Benjamin J. Carey, Bao Yue Zhang, Robi S. Datta, Azmira Jannat, Farjana Haque, Kibret A. Messalea, Chenglong Xu, Salvy P. Russo, Chris F. McConville, Torben Daeneke, Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh

Abstract

Two-dimensional piezotronics will benefit from the emergence of new crystals featuring high piezoelectric coefficients. Gallium phosphate (GaPO4) is an archetypal piezoelectric material, which does not naturally crystallise in a stratified structure and hence cannot be exfoliated using conventional methods. Here, we report a low-temperature liquid metal-based two-dimensional printing and synthesis strategy to achieve this goal. We exfoliate and surface print the interfacial oxide layer of liquid gallium, followed by a vapour phase reaction. The method offers access to large-area, wide bandgap two-dimensional (2D) GaPO4 nanosheets of unit cell thickness, while featuring lateral dimensions reaching centimetres. The unit cell thick nanosheets present a large effective out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficient of 7.5 ± 0.8 pm V-1. The developed printing process is also suitable for the synthesis of free standing GaPO4 nanosheets. The low temperature synthesis method is compatible with a variety of electronic device fabrication procedures, providing a route for the development of future 2D piezoelectric materials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 24 25%
Engineering 12 13%
Chemical Engineering 11 12%
Chemistry 11 12%
Physics and Astronomy 6 6%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#574,339
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9,864
of 57,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,199
of 346,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#266
of 1,424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.