↓ Skip to main content

Casino Taxation in Macao: An Economic Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Casino Taxation in Macao: An Economic Perspective
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9235-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinhua Gu, Pui Sun Tam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 29%
Social Sciences 5 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#397
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,081
of 190,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.