↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating typical flood risks in Yangtze River Economic Belt: application of a flood risk mapping framework

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating typical flood risks in Yangtze River Economic Belt: application of a flood risk mapping framework
Published in
Natural Hazards, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3466-x
Authors

Chengwei Lu, Jianzhong Zhou, Zhongzheng He, Shuai Yuan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 19%
Computer Science 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,683,502
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#284
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,042
of 336,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.