↓ Skip to main content

A Web-based survey among adults aged 40–54 years was time effective and yielded stable response patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Web-based survey among adults aged 40–54 years was time effective and yielded stable response patterns
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, September 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We want to present information about response patterns obtained by web-based survey in a large-scale epidemiological study. Within the RAPS (Risk Adapted Prevention Strategies for colorectal cancer) study, we invited 160,000 randomly selected persons aged 40-54 years in three large German cities from 2015 to 2016 to complete a web-based questionnaire on colorectal cancer risk factors and screening (97 items, average time for completion 15 minutes). Invitation letters and up to two reminder letters were sent to each individual. A total of 21.4% of women and 18.0% of men completed the questionnaire. Overall cumulative response rates were 7.5%, 14.3% and 19.6% after the initial invitation letter, and the first and second reminder, respectively, with prevalences of and associations of key epidemiological parameters (such as family history of cancer, previous colonoscopy etc.) being remarkably stable over across waves of responses. For example, the sex and age distribution of the sample did not change with additional answers gained from additional letters. Web-based questionnaires are feasible, cost- and time-effective in the setting of large-scale epidemiological studies. Although response patterns were remarkably stable over several rounds of reminders with substantially increasing cumulative response rates, future research should address possibilities to further enhance response rates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Lecturer 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#22,456,914
of 27,470,210 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#4,797
of 5,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,863
of 350,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#57
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,470,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.