↓ Skip to main content

Local quality of government and voting with one’s feet

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Regional Science, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Local quality of government and voting with one’s feet
Published in
The Annals of Regional Science, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00168-015-0714-9
Authors

Tobias D. Ketterer, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 34%
Social Sciences 8 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Regional Science
#143
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,648
of 398,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Regional Science
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.