↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs entering the food chain in western Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Animal Health and Production, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of Taenia solium cysticercosis in pigs entering the food chain in western Kenya
Published in
Tropical Animal Health and Production, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11250-015-0949-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lian Francesca Thomas, Leslie Jayne Stevenson Harrison, Philip Toye, William Anson de Glanville, Elizabeth Anne Jesse Cook, Claire Njeri Wamae, Eric Maurice Fèvre

Abstract

Three hundred forty-three pigs slaughtered and marketed in western Kenya were subjected to lingual examination and HP10 Ag-ELISA for the serological detection of Taenia solium antigen. When estimates were adjusted for the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic assays, prevalence of T. solium cysticercosis estimated by lingual exam and HP10 Ag-ELISA was between 34.4 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.4-49.4 %) and 37.6 % (95 % CI 29.3-45.9 %), respectively. All pigs, however, were reported to have passed routine meat inspection. Since T. solium poses a serious threat to public health, these results, if confirmed, indicate that the introduction of control strategies may be appropriate to ensure the safety of pork production in this region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#5,813,072
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#111
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,737
of 393,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Animal Health and Production
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.