| Title |
Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Probiotic Mix and Prebiotic on Growth Performance, Cecal Microbiota Composition, and Protection Against Escherichia coli O78 in Broiler Chickens
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12602-018-9459-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reda Tarabees, Khaled M. Gafar, Mohamed S. EL-Sayed, Awad A. Shehata, Marwa Ahmed |
| Abstract |
The current study conducted to investigate the effects of a multi-strain commercial probiotic mix and prebiotic (isomaltooligosaccharide, IMO) on broiler performance parameters, cecal microbiota composition, and protection against challenge with avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) O78. For this purpose, 101-day-old Cobb chicks were randomly allocated into four experimental groups (G)-G01: basal diet, G02: basal diet and challenged with E. coli O78 at 28 days old, G03: basal diet with probiotic mix and challenged with E. coli O78 at 28 days old, and G04: basal diet with IMO and challenged with E. coli O78 at 28 days old. Results showed that weekly body weights in G03 were heavier (P < 0.05) than those of G01 and G02 at the fourth and fifth week. The body gain at the fourth and fifth week was higher (P < 0.05) in G03 than those of the other groups. The hot carcass weight (g) was significantly higher in broiler chickens kept in G03 and G04 compared with those in the control groups (G01 and G02). The probiotic mix and IMO significantly increased the total lactobacilli and total lactobacilli-enterococci populations in the ceca of treated broilers, respectively compared with those in the control groups. The treated broilers (G03 and G04) also showed lower mortality percentage and E. coli recovery rates the liver and spleen than those in G02. It was concluded that probiotic mix or IMO significantly improved the growth performance and modulated the intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens challenged with APEC O78. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#238
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,131
of 335,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.