| Title |
Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-018-3031-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gareth G. Jones, K. Logishetty, S. Clarke, R. Collins, M. Jaere, S. Harris, J. P. Cobb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 46% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 25% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 32% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,013,985
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#63
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,504
of 337,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.