You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-018-06050-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suzanne B. Hodgkins, Curtis J. Richardson, René Dommain, Hongjun Wang, Paul H. Glaser, Brittany Verbeke, B. Rose Winkler, Alexander R. Cobb, Virginia I. Rich, Malak Missilmani, Neal Flanagan, Mengchi Ho, Alison M. Hoyt, Charles F. Harvey, S. Rose Vining, Moira A. Hough, Tim R. Moore, Pierre J. H. Richard, Florentino B. De La Cruz, Joumana Toufaily, Rasha Hamdan, William T. Cooper, Jeffrey P. Chanton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 146 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 9% |
Mexico | 12 | 8% |
Chile | 8 | 5% |
Canada | 6 | 4% |
Colombia | 5 | 3% |
Argentina | 5 | 3% |
Spain | 3 | 2% |
El Salvador | 3 | 2% |
Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 18% |
Unknown | 62 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 130 | 89% |
Scientists | 11 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 56 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 17% |
Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Other | 39 | 15% |
Unknown | 71 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 65 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 19% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 5% |
Unknown | 95 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#318,293
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,844
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,601
of 348,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#123
of 1,433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.