↓ Skip to main content

Historical perspective on heart function: the Frank–Starling Law

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Historical perspective on heart function: the Frank–Starling Law
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12551-015-0184-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasco Sequeira, Jolanda van der Velden

Abstract

More than a century of research on the Frank-Starling Law has significantly advanced our knowledge about the working heart. The Frank-Starling Law mandates that the heart is able to match cardiac ejection to the dynamic changes occurring in ventricular filling and thereby regulates ventricular contraction and ejection. Significant efforts have been attempted to identify a common fundamental basis for the Frank-Starling heart and, although a unifying idea has still to come forth, there is mounting evidence of a direct relationship between length changes in individual constituents (cardiomyocytes) and their sensitivity to Ca(2+) ions. As the Frank-Starling Law is a vital event for the healthy heart, it is of utmost importance to understand its mechanical basis in order to optimize and organize therapeutic strategies to rescue the failing human heart. The present review is a historic perspective on cardiac muscle function. We "revive" a century of scientific research on the heart's fundamental protein constituents (contractile proteins), to their assemblies in the muscle (the sarcomeres), culminating in a thorough overview of the several synergistically events that compose the Frank-Starling mechanism. It is the authors' personal beliefs that much can be gained by understanding the Frank-Starling relationship at the cellular and whole organ level, so that we can finally, in this century, tackle the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 30%
Engineering 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,972,467
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#138
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,000
of 389,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.